It's remarkably easy to find a seasoned defense lawyer who believes the current system is too vulnerable to racism: Statistically, black juvenile offenders are far more likely to be transferred to adult courts and serve adult time than their white peers who've committed comparable crimes. In either case, they are wrong. However, this belief seems difficult to attribute to. If we are tried like adults then we should be able to do adult things because if your trying to say that kids should be tried as adult then let us do adult things if you're gonna be as unfair and cruel like that!!! For instance, an eleven year old boy shot his father's pregnant fiance' in the back of the head while she was sleeping. Female juveniles think because of their gender, they can really get away with crimes. The government may recommend he still sit in the back seat of a car, but a 10-year-old boy can be charged as an adult for the homicide of a 90-year-old woman and potentially spend the rest of his life in prison. Even if a teen didn't know it was wrong, it doesn't mean it's right.
Another reason for a separate juvenile justice system is because we recognize that the character of a juvenile is not fully formed. In jail, you're not with nice people or peers so it won't help. If they kill someone, they should be executed. This question has become a hot topic recently in this country. This person is normal, they can think straight, they know what they did was wrong. Development and upbringing can shape a child dramatically and just because a teenager makes mistakes or chooses terrible choices, does not mean we should have the same reasonable expectation of them as we do an adult. Would you like to stand trial before a jury of twelve 16-year-olds? Do they deserve the punishment? These kids go to juvenile court and get shortened sentences because of their age, thats not right.
He was going to find out whether he would live or die. But does that apply to children. He doesn't know what he's doing? Crimes are most associated with adults. That way more teens would be discouraged from committing crimes. And maybe some kids just have a severe mental problem but they can still get mental help for that. In these states, if a juvenile is age 16 or 17, and gets charged with any criminal offense, the case is originated and tried in adult criminal court.
A formal hearing and guidelines are in place to assist the judicial waiver process. In apparent recognition of that emotional immaturity, states around the country prohibit juveniles under the age of 18 from voting, serving on a jury, drinking alcohol, gambling, buying cigarettes and even, in some places, from getting a tattoo. Kids are kids and adults are adults. However, Elizabeth Cauffman, professor of psychology and social behavior at the University of California, Irvine, told r that trying minors in adult court and administering severe punishment is entirely counterproductive. He will be charged as an adult under state law. This can cause all kinds of problems such as mental disorders, attempts of suicide, and they may become victims of rape.
Some may have reverse waiver laws that allow juveniles who are charged in adult court to petition that court to have the case transferred to juvenile court; in these cases, the burden is on the juvenile to prove why the case should be transferred to juvenile court. Is there structure in the home? According to one study, black men serve jail sentences that are twenty percent longer than white men for the same crime. Some kid grabbed a gun, and shot you're father in the chest. The truth of the matter is who is right and who is wrong? Trying these teens as adults is really unjust and unfair. How did a violent act cause them to cross over a line that is defined by age? This number should change, as juveniles are not adults, both mentally and physically. Now, the question arises, can children understand what they do? It is different to be a 15- or 16-year-old than a 30-year-old. Underage offenders, being anyone under the age of 18, should not be subject to criminal punishment in adult courts because they are not mature enough to be fully responsible for their actions.
So I believe that children shouldn't be tried as adults. In 1825, the Society for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency was starting a movement that would separate juveniles from adult offenders. These institutions proliferated across other cities and states, followed by the first juvenile court being established in Cook County, Illinois, in 1899. This paper will examine questions, pros and cons of whether children should be tried as adults. Children need guidance, and positive reinforcement in order to reverse their behavior, Ms.
Juveniles need an environment surrounded with guiding adults, education and the resources to help them. According to the law, a person who committed a crime like that should be put behind the bars for more than 30 years. Against Juveniles be Tried as Adults There are many debates as to the ethical reasons for and against the law that juveniles should be tried as adults when they commit a crime that is classified as bad murder. This is one of the main problems of the modern society. A juvenile is subject to a more severe sentence with the limited sentencing available. These developmental differences are part of the reason that the law treats children differently than adults. Juvenile criminals must, and should be tried as adults.
Ultimately, these decisions led Congress to pass the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act in 1974, which still governs the juvenile justice system. In only two states—New York and North Carolina—age 15 is considered the upper age of majority for juvenile court. A juvenile offender may receive a few years in a juvenile detention facility and possibly probation following his release at age eighteen. Anyone who says teens can't tell right from wrong is either too old to remember what being a teenager is like or they are a teenager who has committed a crime and don't want to be tried as an adult. The fundamental question is, are children capable of understanding the consequences of their actions? They commit big boy crimes, they have to do big boy time. The first thing that comes to my mind is crime simply because when i hear the word juvenile, its usually followed by delinquent.
Should minors who commit crimes be prosecuted as adults? However, there is also the view that many individuals feel that Children should not be tried as adults. When a teenager commits such a crime such as murder they must be tried, and they should not be treated with leniency and coddling, but with the full force of the law as an adult. Most major cities soon had facilities that were exclusive for juvenile offenders. Until 1996, 14-year-old murder suspects were handled in juvenile court with rare exception. It could be argued that the age that defines adulthood is somewhat arbitrary and that some leeway should be given to prosecutors to determine whether or not a child has matured to the extent required to be considered an adult.